Home Page - YouTube Channel



Serialism - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Serialism

From the Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can change

Serialism is a way of composing music using a series of notes in a particular order and using this to build up a whole piece of music. These series and patterns can also be applied to other parts of music (Like how loud or soft it is).

[change] A simple example

To show how serialism works we can take a very simple example. Let us use just five notes from the white notes of a keyboard. We can use the notes A, B, C, D and E. We are going to make a “tune” using all these five notes, but not repeating any until all five have been used (although we are allowed to repeat the note we have just had).

For example: we might have D, C, A, A, A, A, B, E. This is what we call our “row” or “series” No it's not there aren't twelve notes there. It is the one we start off with, so we can call it our prime row.

We can change the prime row by playing it backwards. This is called retrograde. So we now get E, B, A, A, A, A, C, D.

We can also change it by playing it upside down. This means that instead of going up one step we go down one step, or instead of going up two steps we go down two steps etc. If we start on the same note D we now get: D, E, G, G, G, G, F, This is called inversion (“upside down”).

We can make it go backwards AND upside down. So we get: F, G, G, G, G, E, D. This is called retrograde inversion.

We now have four ways of playing our row: prime, retrograde, inversion, retrograde inversion. Now we can also change each of these by transposing them. Transposition means starting on a different note. So our prime row D, C, A, A, A, A, B, E could be transposed up three steps (what musicians call a “perfect fourth”) and we get: G, F, D, D, D, D, E, A. Using these five notes there are five transpositions possible (the original plus four others) for each of our versions: prime, retrograde, inversion and retrograde inversion. That means: 5x4=20 ways of playing our tune.

[change] Schoenberg’s twelve-tone series

In 1923 the composer Arnold Schoenberg (1874-1951) developed what he called the “twelve-tone system”. Instead of using just five notes as in our example, he used all 12 notes in the octave (5 black and 7 white notes). Most music we listen to is in a particular key (tonality). This is called “tonal” music. For example: if we start “Twinkle, twinkle little star” on a C we finish on a C at the end and the piece sounds finished. It is “tonal” (in a particular key). In twelve-tone music all 12 notes are equal, there is no “key note” (it is “atonal”). This makes the music very hard to understand and it took people a long time to get used to the sound of Schoenberg’s new music.

Schoenberg was not the only composer to use this way of composing. His pupils Alban Berg (1885-1935) and Anton Webern (1883-1945) also wrote twelve-tone music. The composers Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971) and Aaron Copland (1900-1990) started to write twelve-tone music when they were quite old. Composers such as Benjamin Britten (1913-1976) used it occasionally, often putting it together with music which was tonal (listen to Britten’s opera “Midsummer Night’s Dream”). When contrasted with tonal music in this way it can be very beautiful.

In the 1950s and 1960s some composers like Pierre Boulez (b.1925) and Karlheinz Stockhausen (b.1928) wrote music which was not only twelve-tone, but serial in other ways as well. For example: they organized levels of dynamics (from very quiet to very loud) in a series, and the lengths of notes (from very short to very long), and even timbre (the sound quality). By combining all these things their music became very complicated indeed. When all these things were used for the whole piece of music it was called “total serialism”. Boulez’s Structures I is an example of a piece which uses “total serialism”. A lot of people criticized this music, saying that it was too mathematical instead of being expressive. Such music is hard to understand.

Wikipedia HTML 2008 in other languages

100 000 +

Česká (Czech)  •  English  •  Deutsch (German)  •  日本語 (Japanese)  •  Français (French)  •  Polski (Polish)  •  Suomi (Finnish)  •  Svenska (Swedish)  •  Nederlands (Dutch)  •  Español (Spanish)  •  Italiano (Italian)  •  Norsk (Norwegian Bokmål)  •  Português (Portuguese)  •  Română (Romanian)  •  Русский (Russian)  •  Türkçe (Turkish)  •  Українська (Ukrainian)  •  中文 (Chinese)

10 000 +

العربية (Arabic)  •  Български (Bulgarian)  •  Bosanski (Bosnian)  •  Català (Catalan)  •  Cymraeg (Welsh)  •  Dansk (Danish)  •  Ελληνικά (Greek)  •  Esperanto  •  Eesti (Estonian)  •  Euskara (Basque)  •  Galego (Galician)  •  עברית (Hebrew)  •  हिन्दी (Hindi)  •  Hrvatski (Croatian)  •  Magyar (Hungarian)  •  Ido  •  Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)  •  Íslenska (Icelandic)  •  Basa Jawa (Javanese)  •  한국어 (Korean)  •  Latina (Latin)  •  Lëtzebuergesch (Luxembourgish)  •  Lietuvių (Lithuanian)  •  Latviešu (Latvian)  •  Bahasa Melayu (Malay)  •  Plattdüütsch (Low Saxon)  •  Norsk (Norwegian Nynorsk)  •  فارسی (Persian)  •  Sicilianu (Sicilian)  •  Slovenčina (Slovak)  •  Slovenščina (Slovenian)  •  Српски (Serbian)  •  Basa Sunda (Sundanese)  •  தமிழ் (Tamil)  •  ไทย (Thai)  •  Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)

1 000 +

Afrikaans  •  Asturianu (Asturian)  •  Беларуская (Belarusian)  •  Kaszëbsczi (Kashubian)  •  Frysk (Western Frisian)  •  Gaeilge (Irish)  •  Interlingua  •  Kurdî (Kurdish)  •  Kernewek (Cornish)  •  Māori  •  Bân-lâm-gú (Southern Min)  •  Occitan  •  संस्कृत (Sanskrit)  •  Scots  •  Tatarça (Tatar)  •  اردو (Urdu) Walon (Walloon)  •  יידיש (Yiddish)  •  古文/文言文 (Classical Chinese)

100 +

Nehiyaw (Cree)  •  словѣньскъ (Old Church Slavonic)  •  gutisk (Gothic)  •  ລາວ (Laos)