User talk:Amy
From the Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can change
[change] Checkuser RfA
Thanks for voting, but your comments make it seem as if you have misunderstood what a checkuser's functions are.--Bärliner 21:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe my message was confusing, because I tend to overcomplicate explanations and reasons. I opposed because firstly, User:Vector, I've only seen revert and vote inside the new changes bar that's in the left margin. Other than those he, in my views, is inactive most of the time. Secondly, Vector, not that I've seen based on his contribs, had asked or done anything to give him the rights of checkuser. Lastly, I just plainly and simply think he is not qualified yet. I don't have anything personally against him, but, Razorflame is an active and simple user, (this is just an e.g) and he deserves to be admin more than Vector deserves to be a CU. This is just my views. Please show me anything you can testify against. Svidanyay,--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Still, you're active, you help and you still edit articles often enough. I'm not saying you deserve it, but you deserve it MORE than Vector deserves CU in my point of view. --♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
-
Hm. Then I am completely eligible to run right now, and I could get so many supports but I don't deserve the tools. Should we go with the mulitude or the guidlines?--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)