User talk:Majorly

[change] Chairperson section removal

I removed the section on the Chairperson page before. It was undone by Razorflame. I discussed it with Razorflame why I deleted it and he agreed with me and so I was "allowed" to delete it again. I deleted it again. Now another guy (you, Majorly) decided to undo the deletion, so now I have to discuss (again) why I deleted it. I'm wondering how many times this can be repeated, I guess it can be repeated as many times as there are Wikipedia "editors" but here we go:

I removed the Religion section on Chairperson for the fact that the religion section is totally irrelevant. On the page is written: "In Christianity, a chairperson is the person who is in charge of the chairs of people in the Society of Friends." I removed this section because:

It is the same thing as writing the following on the page about "Volunteer": "In Scientology, a volunteer is a person who helps gathering new members for the Church of Scientology."

It's exactly the same, so I think removing it is the only right thing to do, and it's not at all vandalism. So now you know why I removed it ;-)

You can always try to convince me otherwise ofcourse.

If you bothered using an edit summary to explain your removal, you wouldn't have to explain every time. Removal of text without obvious reason is treated as vandalism. Majorly (talk) 09:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I've looked a little bit closer and I've found the "edit summary" thing so I'll use it from now on. But let's be honoust, if you would've read the content I removed you should know that it does not belong there, right? Edit: I just tried that "summary" thing and my text doesn't even fit in it so I shortened it a little bit.

Well it's supposed to be a summary, not an essay. Majorly (talk) 14:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Help Would Be Appreciated

Hello I am (fairly) new to Wikipedia in general and Simple especially. I'd be very grateful if you could go to my user page and look at some of the articles in the list of ones I have created. I think they are pretty good myself but another opinion and some advice would be appreciated. many thanks --The Flying Spaghetti Monster (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Nice work so far! Majorly (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Efficiency

Congrats on your 100th block! --Gwib ^-(talk)- 20:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Thanks.

You have a habit of welcoming me. ;) Thanks for pointing out the link, too. · AndonicO ^Engage. 13:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Welcome back!

Hi there! Welcome back! Missed ya! Cheers, Razorflame 14:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I haven't been anywhere. Btw what do you think of Wikipedia:Not Now? Majorly ^talk 14:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

You haven't been on, so therefore, I thought that you had left...anyways, other than that page being a bit complex for us, it is a great page. Cheers, Razorflame 14:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[change] Edit to RfA header

Majorly, This edit is not right, especially for an experienced user like yourself. I understand that you may be annoyed after the comments on RfA, but if you wish to discuss it further, take it to Simple Talk or the Admin Noticeboard. Edits like that aren't solving anything. Archer7 - talk 14:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

What was wrong with it, exactly? Creol and most others certainly don't think it's no big deal. Majorly ^talk 14:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

It violates WP:POINT. I don't wish to argue with you. Please use Simple Talk or the AN to discuss it further. Archer7 - talk 14:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Correcting wrong information violated WP:POINT? Wow. No, I'd rather not argue with you, I'd rather you left my edits alone in future. If you want to give a false idea that candidates will be accepted as "no big deal", so be it. Majorly ^talk 15:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

You have made me lose respect for you. Your actions both on the English Wikipedia and here have made me lose a lot of respect for you. I used to look up to you because you were all cool and stuff, but now, I don't even want to have interactions with you. That is just how much of my respect you have lost. Come back and edit when you can act like someone in your position. Right now, I just don't see that coming from you anymore. Razorflame 20:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry you feel that way. It's not my fault that certain bureaucrats enjoy treating users less powerful than themselves like crap. Majorly ^talk 21:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[change] Barnstar!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For all your hard work reverting vandalism and such, even though at times it seems discouraging, I award you this Barnstar! --  ✰AmericanEagle  17:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[change] Reply at my editor review

My reply here. -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 11:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

[change] Iz spam RFA?

Thank you for your recent support in my RFA which closed successfully with 26 supports and a lone oppose. I hope to serve the community to the best of my ability. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

[change] deletions

Gah, I thought I'd done that. Thanks for the pointer. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)