Wikipedia talk:Sandbox
From the Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can change
are interwiki links deliberately kept out on Simple? --Hemanshu 09:57, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Not that I know of. Angela 18:04, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
-
- Then how come I can't see the interlinks on the editing window? 5 Sept 2004 w:User:Ellsworth
[change] "Simple" English
Since I be's a Limey, I find the term "simple Polish" insulting. Why not simple Yiddish or simple Swahili The language is English if you don't mind and not Simple English. — This unsigned comment was added by 217.124.4.60 (talk • changes) on 26 October 2004.
- Simple English is a simplified form of English – ABCD 02:37, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Since I'm a Yank :) I agree...— This unsigned comment was added by 162.84.197.162 (talk • changes) on 05:10, 4 August 2005.
If you want a general view, use the simple version. For work and such, use the regular. It's true for all languages.68.205.154.68 20:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
[change] Sandbox = Wikipedia:Sandbox?
The page on sandbox should not redirect here. There should be a description (at least a stub) there of what a sandbox is, with a link to this page. I will make the appropriate changes. --Cromwellt|talk 21:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
--65.33.157.100 19:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)--65.33.157.100 19:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)--65.33.157.100 19:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)--65.33.157.100 19:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Keep it simple!
How about pig latin thats a real kick ass Language ha!!!! 76.174.134.16 04:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[change] "copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content" is not very simple.
This is not very simple. "Texts that are copied with permission from other works, mean words, and words that harm emotional well-being" sound much better. Coffsneeze 20:20, 2 May 2007 (
50 cent is the man he is so rich he smokes them
