User talk:ChristianMan16/Archive/3
From the Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can change
[change] Hey...
So you're the editor formerly known as Hornetman. LOL, sorry. You have become something of a "legend" In the normal Wikipedia where I am an active editor. You've changed alot. Maybe this wikipedia is more easy, no? Anyways leave me a message. I would love to help you expand articles.SimonKSK 19:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Okay...That's gonna be tough. You mean Simple like "said" instead of "stated"?SimonKSK 20:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] So...
Who do you think is gonna win the TLC match? And shouldn't we add more PPVs?SimonKSK 02:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] StatusBot
A StatusBot has now been implimented on this Wikipedia. Feel free to follow the instructions at User:SoxBot to set up your Status. Cheers, Razorflame 03:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Because you're Nice!
![]() |
The IuseRosary Barnstar - For all things Nice | |
Because you are all things nice : ) A Nice editor and a Nice person. It hasn't gone unoticed. IuseRosary? (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC) |
[change] Red links
User:ChristianMan16/sandbox/WrestleMania 21 has to many red links. Once it is posted it's needs to have on there {{redlinks}} you may add it now your later
Cheers, Running talk 23:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Userpage Barnstar!
![]() |
The Excellent Userpage Award | |
This is for the great looking userpage you created -- ✰AmericanEagle 19:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
[change] Night of Champions ready....
There was almost nothing to change, but change it if I missed anything....
SimonKSK 22:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
WM21 ready for checking.... User:ChristianMan16/sandbox/WrestleMania 21 SimonKSK 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
OK....SimonKSK 00:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Done! Can you tell me how to do a green check? User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/WWE Brand Extension. SimonKSK 01:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/WWE Royal RumbleSimonKSK 01:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Alright...
I'm working on it... -- ✰AmericanEagle 19:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Done - I started it. But I have to go. Cheers -- ✰AmericanEagle 19:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- I guess I didn't, those socks were on Ben and LuR's feet a few days ago. lol. Sorry about opposing you in the RfA, I had it neutral at first, but then Razor told me that wasn't allowed. But you're doing way much better now. Also, are you still HornetMan? Or did they change it yet. Cheers -- ✰AmericanEagle 20:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, is that so. I could give you an endorsement or ask them myself to change you. Could that work? -- ✰AmericanEagle 20:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to miss him... just kidding, I never met him. Cheers -- ✰AmericanEagle 20:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Reverting my move of 12 rounds.
Are you saying that this isn't notable? Clearly, that article is notable. Cheers, Razorflame 03:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] RE: Your RfA
This is hard to explain. Listen ... (I'm rewriting this over and over) ... I think that you are on the right path, and you're not a sock-puppeteer anymore. At first, I did vote neutral, but I found out that that wasn't allowed. But being an admin (or so I hear) is much more complicated that it looks. I mean, having that kind of tools cannot be just handed out. It has to completely untrusted. Also, you've been mostly editing wrestling-related articles only (at least for the most part, but I am partly guilty of that with Christian-related articles). I think that it takes much more experience (that's why I haven't run). As for not liking your reasons, anyone would like to have them to delete and for moving there articles, but it is more special then that. And you shouldn't say you expect to fail, only run to win. I hope you understand what I'm saying. No hard feelings? Cheers -- ✰AmericanEagle 03:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- See, if I ran, I would be opposed by some. That doesn't mean I'm a bad editor, just that I'm not quite ready (which, I doubt that I am right now). I get what you mean by "That's what you know about," I've tried to explain that to people with my Christian articles. I like working on those. Just if you see formatting mistakes in articles, or typos, or such, just make sure you work on those and keep you eyes open to errors. You'll find them, even if you aren't looking for them and focusing on Wrestling as long as you try. You don't have to create or expand articles you have no clue about, just every once in a white click "Show any page" and check an article. But that is not wholly why I was neutral/weak oppose. Also, next time I notice the Rays playing, I'll root for them! lol. I like the Tigers, mostly all Detroit sports. But I am starting to fully trust you (along with most of the other editors here), so keep at it, you'll get. Before doing, (just a piece of advice), ask an admin if you're ready. That's the road I've chosen. Thanks for eading my long messages. Cheers -- ✰AmericanEagle 04:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Barnstars!
![]() |
American Eagle's Barnstar of Excellence | |
For your killing Hornetman16, I award you my Barnstar! -- ✰AmericanEagle 18:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For you creating very long and very informative articles on wrestling people and stuff, I hear by award you this Barnstars! -- ✰AmericanEagle 18:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC) |
[change] List of WWE Diva's Championship reigns by length
I nominated the redirect for quick deletion because nobody, absolutely nobody, will type that in as a search for the WWE Diva's Championship. Note that the R3 criteria also accommodates "uncommon redirect" per the template instructions. I'll renominate for {{qd}} again if that's okay. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also, please note that en-wiki redirects WWE Diva's Championship to WWE Women's Championship - do you know something (which you can verify) that the rest of us don't? I would recommend adding some references. Plus, deleting that redirect should have no effect on the template you've referred me to as the article on reigns should most definitely not exist yet since the tournament has not even been hosted once! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, you don't need to "create" a redirect for an article which doesn't exist (and won't until there's been at least one instance of this championship). I'm confused why you think this list is needed right now? Besides the template (which can be adjusted when required) there's no requirement for this page at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Given that the SmackDown! title is as much a seperate entity as the WWE Championship, ECW championship (WWE) and the World Heavyweight Championship are from from each other, combining the SmackDown! and RAW womens titles as one single title is just as wrong combining those three. The entire aim of the brand separation (excluding the ECW/Smackdown! and soon to be ECW/RAW colaberation) is to give seperate identities to each product's performers. With rare exceptions, WWE has kept each brand entirely seperate. (Cross over's do exist mainly as a special appearence or brand vs brand confrontation and certain performers - Hornswoggle/Finlay - have cross over status due to storylines but overall, they are two seperate groups) -- Creol(talk) 08:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Rest assured should I wish to know more about the wrestling articles here I'll ask those whom I think would be most useful. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] RE: SIG
Sorry to quit our "SIG Group," but I created (myself) a new sig. How's it look? I won't be on much or any on Sunday, I'm sure you understand. Good night Aaron. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] uhhh...
I didn't finish the WWE US championship, I only put it there for futher use. It's not simple yet.SimonKSK 17:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] RE: My thoughts...
I just now was able to get on my computer. I think that it looks unique (and cool). Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe, should it test run? I would test it out for awhile. Got to go in a minute. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Good morning :) -- ApEtSIG 20:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not fully done, but I think that I may have to go in a moment. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 22:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Sockpuppet
You are User:Hornetman16 on ENWP using your global account. 67.189.185.73 (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, he's actually User:ChristianMan16 over there, and we ENWP folks are already aware of the situation - Alison ❤ 16:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] And on that note ...
... you really need to see this. If you wish to make a statement here, I'll gladly post it over yonder. But just one statement and no long conversations, okay? Glad to have helped on this one! - Alison ❤ 16:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] My sig...
But you have to admit, it looks pretty cool. At least, that's what I thought. Cheers -- America †alk 03:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Turning a comment into a vote
Hey CM16, can you explain why you turned a comment into an oppose vote per this please? Vector has already added a comment in the support section and I don't think it's appropriate for you to modify the position or content of his comment. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Time out
Not that you're doing it, but can we drop the arguing for awhile. Thanks -- America †alk 22:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not sure, cool clock by the way. -- America †alk 22:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Guess that it doesn't. It still looks great anyway. Cheers -- America †alk 23:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] vandalism
For me this is a vandalism, can you explain what you done? --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Image
Do you badly need the image I restored? Other admins don't exactly agree with me, and want me to redelete it. Maxim (talk | editor review) 22:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Review
Could you review me? Thanks -- America †alk 04:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Edits
Aren't you interested in something other than wrestling, kid? John Stalvern (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Hello...
How was church? -- America †alk 03:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Really, that wouldn't be fun. -- America †alk 03:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I give you a brake you backsliding. lol. Thank God (really) you had those 40 miles left. -- America †alk 03:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- You must've liked those Star Wars episodes. (hint, hint) -- America †alk 03:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- It was pretty good (at least, good effects and an "epic" feeling you got in it). Plus we watched it in theaters, so that makes almost any movie better. If we were on en:WP, we would both be blocked for turning this into a chat room for friends (I mean, I would lol). -- America †alk 03:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but I've gotten that warning message there. Even though a Muslim just asked what I thought about his religion, so I answered him. They're annoying there. Still working on those Star Wars articles, hey! You do know about something besides wrestling! I'm working on my final draft of Charles Spurgeon, that's taking work. -- America †alk 03:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] Editor review
Hello Christianman. I just wanted to tell you I joined the Christian WikiProject. And I was hoping if you could review me. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] My revert
I reverted the changes to RF's RfA as the problem with figuring out the count was not in the use of the templates. Vector and my votes were easy enough to understand and there was no need to make an emphasis that we were opposing since we listed it under the oppose section supplying the main reason as being per M/ so the change was both unneeded and a change to what the editors actually said (not in what they meant as the changes you made did not change that, but their word choice and it is thier right to make their point as they feel is right). It was clear that we were in opposition. Half the other opposes are not so clear given points I brought up in the comments about people thinking through there position before saying something about the matter and having to actually search through the history to ensure the original commenter was the one who struck their votes.. or such as maxim, voted oppose, struck that and voted strongly oppose.. oi.. couldn't he just reply to his own vote and emphasis the point rather than causing more headaches??... -- Creol(talk) 06:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[change] My RFA
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contribution at my RFA which closed successfully with 26 supports and your lone oppose. I hope to serve the community to the best of my ability and I hope that your concerns over my inactivity will soon be assuaged. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
[change] Evolution
Hello, I am in the process of "re-vamping" Evolution so that it can still be a very good article. I invite yxou to contribute what oyu think can be done. In the revampled article I created a section called Responses to the idea of evolution. It links to Social responses to the idea of evolution as a main article. When the first ideas of evolution began to be discussed (afaik Lamarckism) there were of course people who did not like it; ever since, people have talked about it.
I would be glad if you could do a proofreading/copyediting